Heras, we will miss you….

Posted on January 1, 2008

I felt so bad for the poor guy. He feels as he is being punished for using EPO and now can’t continue making a living on his bike.

According to him he does not understand the “code of ethics” of the UCI…..as far as I can tell he doesn’t understand a lot of people’ code of ethics. What kind of douche bag can sit there and complain about harsh penalties as punishment for cheating? What type of code of ethics does he follow? Can you imagine if you go out there, kill someone, go to jail for 25 years, get out and then complain why nobody wants to give you a job!

Get a life you idiot.

» Filed Under Cycling

Comments

One Response to “Heras, we will miss you….”

  1. carlos on January 3rd, 2008 11:40 am

    Hey I couldn’t find any other way to contact you, so I’m trying through this post. What’s up with the Unattached gif in your advertising column?

    If it’s meant to be satire, then I can truly appreciate that. The whole concept lends itself to being a target for such attacks. I only ask that you would do so without using my copyrighted artwork.

    If it’s not satire, please do not put the brand nor the link on your advertising section. I don’t advertise as that would put the kit in legal jeopardy in sanctioned USCF events. Unattached Riders aren’t allowed to wear advertisements on their apparel. That’s why the kit simply states, in black-and-white, that the rider is unattached.

    Moreover, I don’t advertise because I’m really just doing this for kicks. Advertising might give the impression that this is a profitable and proper business, when really it’s not. It’s just a little bit of notoriety in exchange for a lot of my time. So I’m currently not taking any more orders.

    Perhaps come ordering time next year I will send you a proper banner. But for now, I’m happy with the 70 or so riders wearing this kit this coming season.

    Regards.

Leave a Reply




  • Pages

  • About

    A place for me to speak my mind and hear what people have to say. Sometimes too harsh, sometimes brutaly honest